Showing posts with label Stainless Steel Watch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stainless Steel Watch. Show all posts

Grenen Men's Stainless Steel Mesh Wristwatch Review

Grenen Men's Stainless Steel Mesh Wristwatch Review

Read more:

Fossil AM4364 Stainless Steel Watch - Stainless Steel Blog





Have you noticed that men's wrist watches are getting thicker and thicker? To rebel against the clunky watch trend, you should check out brands like Skagen--the Danish watchmaker. Scandinavian designs feature common articles done in an uncommonly sparse and clean way. Naturally, Skagen makes thin, streamlined, and superbly comfortable watches. When I came across Skagen's Grenen brand at a Kohls department store in Tallahassee, Florida, I was excited. Grenen brings simple, sleek, Scandinavian watch design from Skagen to the poor huddled masses at affordable department store prices.


Should I use the Stainless Steel Watches




I chose the Grenen Stainless Steel Mesh Watch (model M - 24XLBBB) which retails at full price for around $85. However, I found mine on sale for far less. My Grenen watch features a slim Japanese quartz movement, an all stainless steel case, and a fine stainless steel mesh band. It's all done with a deep black finish that evokes ninjas, tuxedos, and the night. For another affordable thin dress watch, consider the Hamlin Ultra Thin Stainless Steel Dress Watch.

Is This Burberry Watch Real Or Fake? - Stainless Steel Blog



The Grenen Stainless Steel Mesh Watch has a minimalist design centered around a traditional round case measuring one and a half inches in diameter. In contrast to clunky watches from makers like Invicta, the Grenen case is a wafer thin quarter inch thick. The watch features a raised track with silver-tone Arabic numerals for 1 through 12. Inside the track of the numbers, the face is slightly recessed. A small portal reveals the date at just above the six o'clock position. Just below 12 o'clock, there is a small white logo, the Grenen name and Denmark. Just above the date portal, tiny white letters remind the wearer that this thin watch is made of steel. The watch hands have thin inserts of luminous material. The layout is sparse, functional, and effective.

This Grenen watch has a thin, fine, steel mesh band that almost imperceptibly tapers from 7/8 of an inch wide at the case pins down to about half an inch at the clasp. Fine mesh bands are very comfortable because they don't catch and pull arm hairs. The fold-over clasp with safety has smooth surfaces and doesn't cut into your flesh if you rest the weight of your wrist on the clasp while typing, computing, or doing other general office tasks. The fold-over clasp ensures that the watch stays securely fastened to your wrist.

I need help figuring out the value of this watch



I found only a three minor drawbacks with my Grenen. First, the crystal tends to show fingerprints and I find myself wiping it off regularly. Second, the mesh band seems a little delicate when compared to traditional watch bands. Third, the date portal is very small and can be a little difficult to read. Since I rotate several watches during the week and keep the watch cased when it's not in use, I doubt that I'll ever wear out this Grenen watch.

Since the thin case fits neatly under any dress shirt cuff and the Grenen is comfortable to wear while using a keyboard, I'd say that this watch is nearly perfect for the office. If a man needs a watch for a formal occasion such as his prom or wedding day, this Grenen is clearly an affordable wristwatch option that looks rich and sophisticated. Its sleek Scandinavian design and black finish give the watch a polished look that would work well with a tuxedo or suit. In a world where less is often less, this Grenen wristwatch clearly offers more.

Sources:
Kohls.com

Fossil AM4364 Stainless Steel Watch

Fossil AM4364 Stainless Steel Watch


The Fossil AM4364 Mini Flight Stainless Steel watch for women is one of the newer releases from Fossil in 2011 as of this writing. While other watches have quite a few different bells and whistles, the main highlight of this version is its simplicity and elegant look.


It has a stainless steel construction for both the band and the casing, it has a handy fold over closure with push button release. It has three hands and a date display with a white face and silver color to set it off. A good choice in women's watches for a lady who knows that great looks do not always equal tons of features. Retail price for this watch is around $85.

If you are interesting in comparing this watch to others with a rather similar look and price range, here are some good picks for you to check out:

Bulova Ladies 43M103 Stainless Steel Watch


This watch from Bulova has a similar look and construction, with a bit of a difference on the face of the watch. It is made from stainless steel, and like the AM4364 it has a silver tone to the case and the band with a fold-over closing with push button release. The retail price for this watch is around $90.

Fossil Stella Watch in Cream Pie:


The Stella watch has a bit of a similar look to the AM4364 with a white and silver contrasting style. However this watch features more of a candied appearance, the main color for the band and the face being white, with silver accents. There are crystals about the bezel to set this watch off and it has three smaller displays within the face of the watch. This watch has a retail price of around $100.

GUESS G96037L Stainless Steel Watch:


This watch from Guess is an elegant accessory that also has a silver tone created from stainless steel. The dial on this watch is mother of pearl, with crystals surrounding the bezel for a shiny and stylish look. The retail price for this watch is around $95.

Fossil makes some excellent watches for women, it seems that each different timepiece is made with great quality and has its own unique look at a price that will not break the bank. The Fossil AM4364 watch for women is one of these in the lineup that has an elegant and simple style, as well as a reasonable price.

Should I use the Stainless Steel Watches

Should I use the Stainless Steel Watches?

Watches are a very important part of a person's daily wear. They have to be of functional value as well as attractive enough to serve as a correct accessory according to a person's attire. Stainless steel watches have long been a synonym for functionality and style.
 Watches are what everyone needs and probably this is the reason why there is an ongoing race amongst the watch companies to create the best and the newest versions. The companies make continuous efforts to create watches that set them apart from the rest.


Varied components, styles, types and designs form a new and advanced wrist unit. The prime focus however has to be on the material that is used to make these watches. Stainless steel is the most widely used material in the manufacture of watches.
 Watches have to be good looking and functional but the comfort factor cannot be overlooked. This is the component that has to be constant for all watches manufactured by a company. Stainless steel is an element that has a lot of strength and turgidity and can fight the harsh weather conditions.


It is corrosion resistant and does not stain and is resistant of any other sort of damage as well. Stainless steel is the synonym for strength and durability for years. This is the reason why it is an essential raw material for the making all sorts of watches.
 Stainless-steel watches are available in innumerous designs, shapes, features and styles; they are manufactured with all watch brands. This means that a customer has an array of products to choose from.
 One can buy a stainless steel watch at any price and of any brand; they have become popular because of the strength and versatility that these watches offer. There are stainless-steel watches for men, women and children.


Most companies obviously like to play it safe in the manufacture of their products. This is because they have a high risk and investment at stake, hereby they use the traditionally time tested materials for the manufacture of their products to decrease the risk factor, to increase the certainty of a good sale.
 The Stainless steel watch is the most widespread and desired watch type. It is a hit favorite among the customers as they also look for style performance and strength all under one roof. A watch is a long term investment and one should be certain of its performance features before purchasing them.


A genuine stainless steel watch ensures that a person has to pay only once and get the benefits of a good watch for years to come. These are maintenance free and can be used by the careless lot as well.
 In comparison to the other materials used in the process of watch making, stainless steel is rich looking and has a unique starry shine and lucrative appeal to its buyers. Exclusive pieces can be crafted with priceless jewels and stones to make it more of an eye-candy. These watches are known for the functionality and style.


Stainless steel watches are a hot favorite of the buyers and manufacturers as they are perfectly functional and are known for strength, style and long term resistance qualities.







I need help figuring out the value of this watch

I need help figuring out the value of this watch

I know that this isn't the best picture but I needed a little bit of help...lol. It says "Geneva Quartz" on the front, then underneath in VERY TINY LETTERS it says "Japan Movt" Then on the underside it says "Stainless steel", "Japan Movt", "Water Resistant".
http://s202.photobucket.com/albums/aa16/Krazee-2-Tha-Insane/Halp/?action=view&current=001.jpg

I'm looking to sell it and I just want to know in what price range I should put it. I've looked practically everywhere. Please help! lol. Thank you in advance! =)
Shucks! I can't get out anywhere! I don't even know where anything is, nor do I want to pay for appraisal. =( lol


Best answer:
Answer by c-johnnn!! :)
i would take it to a jeweler to ask for an expert opinion. they will help you out a lot and make sure your getting the true value.


Give your answer to this question below!

Major changes at Roger Dubuis


Major changes at Roger Dubuis


Next week I am spending a few days at the Roger Dubuis atelier near Geneva airport; so, before I write the report on that visit, I thought that you might like to read this piece I wrote about the major changes at the company earlier this year.


If this year's SIHH salon was characterized by any one thing, it was conservatism, most brands played it very, very safe.


But one brand stood apart from all this conservatism and introduced a whole new line and a brand new complicated movement; this was Roger Dubuis, a brand with whom I have had a long complicated relationship. Let me explain, I have long held that their movements are some of the most interesting, stunningly designed and beautifully finished being made in any factory in Switzerland. Have a look at these:





Let’s be honest here, if you wanted a perpetual calendar, wouldn’t this be the perfect way of displaying the day, date & month?



You might not like the rest of the dial (and I don’t) but isn’t that the perfect perpetual calendar display, how come no-one else does it & no-one has done it since Patek did a few pocket watches with that display, but even they haven’t made one in over 50 years and they never made a wristwatch version.

But before we look at what is happening with Roger Dubuis now, it is important to understand the short history of the firm. Roger Dubuis (who was a real person); like Laurent Ferrier, Peter Speke-Marin and F-P Journe worked for many years restoring classic wrist & pocket watches from the great names & built up a reputation as one of the finest watchmakers of his generation.
In the early 1990s he set out on his own and with some investors built a brand new factory near Geneva airport and in 1995 began to produce the first watches to bear his own name. The factory was the first brand new one to be built in Geneva since the ‘quartz crash’ of the 1970s and was equipped with the latest equipment; spark & wire erosion machines and the newest CNC borers and lathes. The great advantage of this equipment is that it is inherently very flexible and the new firm took advantage of this flexibility to do something no-one else had ever done, they announced that ALL their watches would be limited editions, with precious metal watches in runs of just 28 units for each metal. The number chosen ended in 8, because it was considered a lucky number in Chinese numerology.

The limited edition idea was brilliant, but in implementing it, the firm built a rod for their own backs. If you only make a few dozen of a piece, it isn’t enough to allow all the problems to be worked out and the firm developed a reputation as a company with exciting designs but very bad reliability. The initial watches were amazingly complex; this early perpetual calendar from RD was one of the first watches to use double retrograde indication and was housed in their signature case design, known as ‘Sympathie’. It was a combination of cushion & round shapes and utilised one of the most complex sapphire crystals of its time.



Not long after the company ramped up to full production, M. Dubuis left the company, the circumstances of his departure are not known, but after his departure two things happened; firstly the company began to launch much more extreme case and dial designs and the service problems became even more prevalent. The introduction of new models & movements increased at an exponential rate, resulting in the introduction of 30 new movements in the first 15 years of the firm’s existence, most of these movements were complicated ones, ranging from split second chronographs to the world’s first watch with twin tourbillons. For comparison, this was during the time when the long established (and much larger) Patek Philippe had introduced less than a quarter of that number of new movements.

Not only was the company introducing new models and movements at a ferocious rate, the firm also became increasingly embroiled in litigation; it was involved in lawsuits filed by everyone from its US distributor to the minority shareholder, all the while trying to placate the Swiss Bank Credit Suisse who held a mortgage on the factory and who was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the potential of its investment. This period of conflict came to a head in October 2006, when what I call ‘The war of the Press Releases’ began; like most watch writers outside Switzerland I knew nothing about this until I got a press release from RD in my inbox on the afternoon of 2nd October, this release stated that the firm “...would like to make a formal denial of the rumours that a large Group, active in the watch domain, has recently acquired his company.
This information, which is totally unfounded, is particularly inopportune, coming at a time when, backed by an extremely effective industrial infrastructure, the ROGER DUBUIS Manufacture is completely independent, designing, developing and manufacturing all the components of its own movements, including the regulating organ (the sprung balance).
Finally, the numerous development projects currently under way, most notably the increase in production, testify to the growing demand of international markets and the Brand’s excellent prospects for the future.”

What this release did was to alert those of us outside Switzerland that there were some problems at RD and so I began to keep a closer eye on the firm & this was rewarded the following year when on 5th March I received another bizarre press release from the company. This lengthy document denied a report published earlier that day, in the Swiss business publication ‘L Aegifi’, the release made public to a much wider audience just how deep the rift within the company had become and that there were several legal matters still outstanding.

Less than a year after I got the release categorically denying “the rumours that a large Group, active in the watch domain, has recently acquired his company”; I received one from Richemont stating that they had acquired the manufacturing facility of Roger Dubuis. They took over the factory, the machines and most of the employees; as part of the deal, RD & Richemont signed an agreement that RD watches would still be made in the factory and that RD would design, distribute & service these watches. But anyone who could read between the lines could see that the days of an independent Roger Dubuis company were numbered; and so it came to pass that on the 11th of August that Richemont took over RD totally.

The question that we all asked was ‘Why?’; in many ways, Richemont had bought a ‘poisoned chalice’; the firm’s reputation was in tatters, it was engaged in legal turmoil on two continents and as the world’s economies staggered in the wake of the failure of Lehmann Brothers, the market for expensive ostentatious watches (which was all the firm made) shrank quicker than any other. The smart money assumed that what Richemont wanted was the factory, its equipment and its staff; of all the watch factories in Switzerland, the RD one was probably the best equipped and most modern after Greubel Forsey and Renaud et Papi, but unlike those two it had the great advantage of being based in the canton of Geneva, enabling its movements to qualify for the coveted ‘Geneva Seal’ certification. The smart money seemed to be proved right when Cartier (without a doubt Richemont’s most important brand) introduced its first watch with the Geneva Seal at the SIHH in March 2008. At the following year’s SIHH Cartier launched several watches with the seal, meaning that they were made at the Meyrin factory, particularly notable was the Santos skeleton which quite evidently drew on RD’s massive experience with skeletonised plate design.



Most observers looked at the new Geneva Seal Cartier watches being introduced and compared that to the paucity of introductions by RD at the 2009 SIHH and made the assumption that RD was on its way out. But Richemont seemed to not be one of those, and towards the end of 2010, made two important appointments to the firm; firstly it was announced that Georges Kern was taking on the position of CEO on 1st October, Kern is currently head of IWC and seen as one of the heirs apparent to take over the helm of Richemont, so this appointment was seen as Richemont’s affirmation that it had faith in the long term future of the brand. The second appointment was perhaps more extraordinary, within weeks of Kern’s joining RD the firm announced that Dominique Tadion was coming on board as Director of Communications. The role of ‘PR Girl’ is often thought of as someone only peripherally involved in the horological industry; but that cannot be said of Ms. Tadion, she was a dominant force in her field during her 15 year career heading the communication department at Rolex.

What these two appointments said to me was that Richemont was not only not giving up on RD; rather that they were prepared to commit serious resources into rebuilding the brand, this theory gained traction when just before the end of last year I heard that RD would be launching an entirely new movement aimed at a more affordable price point.

So, it was with my curiosity truly piqued that I walked into the RD press briefing first thing on Tuesday morning. Interestingly the place was laid out like a casino, with a large Roulette table dominating the space.



The rumours of a new movement were confirmed within minutes of the presentation starting, called the RD 680, this new movement signalled a return to the values and designs of the company when M. Dubuis was involved. The automatic chronograph movement with microrotor was (for an RD movement) quite conservative, with no skeletonising, 30 minute register only, classic column wheel operation, 30mm diameter, 5.6mm high, 28,800 bph and with a 50 hour power reserve.



It was housed in a case called the ‘Monegasque’, although those who have followed the brand will know it as a simplified version of the original ‘Sympathie’ case.



I used the word ‘conservative’ above to describe the movement, the same word could also be used to describe the watch, and it could well be the least flamboyant watch ever to come out of the factory, even down to the size, it is a normal sized 42mm case with the standard 2 lug strap fitting.

Earlier in this piece I have written a lot about the quality control problems that the firm has faced, I did so because the presentation also talked about these self same problems and what the firm has now done to solve them. Like an alcoholic; if you want to be cured, the first step is to admit that there is a problem; at the presentation RD did this and went on to explain the three step programme that all their watches will now go through. I mentioned earlier that all RD movements qualified for the Geneva Seal, but this only covers the location where they are made and the levels of hand-finishing but not timekeeping nor quality control. This is where RD have been smart, they have outsourced the entire verification and final QC processes, the watches now go to an independent organisation called Timelab set up by the Canton of Geneva where watches are checked for Geneva Seal qualification, timed to see if they meet COSC standards and inspected for quality control issues; all of these tests are under one roof. When the testing is complete, Timelab can issue both the Geneva Seal qualifications and the COSC certificates.



The La Monegasque line will be more than just the chronograph shown above, also in the range will be a limited edition version with a dial which has the appearance of varnished wood, with a most unusual strap and powered by one of the earlier RD chronograph calibres.





The second image shows the difference between the new movement & the older style RD calibre, the dial shown on the watch on the left is very much inspired by the Roulette table iconography.

The range is topped & tailed by a simple time only piece, shown below:



And a gorgeous perpetual calendar with a most unusual dial layout, shown here:



There are two major shifts from the RD philosophy of old, these will be regular production models, not limited in any way (other than the specific limited editions) and the pricing will be similar to or slightly below other high end brands for watches with similar complications with prices ranging between 24,000 Swiss Francs for the time only watches to 67,000 Swiss Francs for the perpetual calendar. Remembering that the Swiss Franc and the US Dollar are pretty much equivalent nowadays, I consider 67,000 CHF a fair price for a rose gold perpetual calendar with an in house Geneva Seal movement.

Of course, it wouldn’t be Roger Dubuis if there wasn’t an exotic version, and the other limited edition in the La Monegasque range is this platinum cased flying tourbillion:







I think that the La Monegasque range has a good chance of reviving the brand, but it all depends on the support of the dealers and I think that when they see the new watches and when they understand that the deep pockets of Richemont are fully committed to the brand, then they will become as enthusiastic as I am.

One of the most extravagant signature lines of Roger Dubuis was the Excalibur range, oversized, with exploding roman numerals and a castellated case with triple lugs, it was the basis for many of the firm’s most complicated watches, and here it is housing a split seconds chronograph.



I had always assumed that this was a watch specifically aimed at Oil Sheikhs and Russian Oligarchs, as its flamboyant styling was never designed to appeal to your normal haute horlogerie client. However, there is a large group of people who like colourful watches and have no problem with pieces which have extravagant styling; this group is called ‘women’. So RD have taken the simple path of reducing the size of the Excalibur to a more reasonable 36mm, retained all of the other signature Excalibur features and equipped it with a 11½”’ self winding movement. Available as a simple unadorned timepiece all the way up to fully pavé versions, they make a lot more sense than the more ostentatious models they previously aimed at the feminine market.







The ladies’ versions of the Excalibur will run from a very affordable 12,000 Swiss Francs up to around twice that

The truth is that no-one knows if Roger Dubuis will make it in the long term, Richemont has always looked at their corporate plans 5 to 10 years ahead, if they see no future role for RD in their portfolio, they would have no problems with disposing of the brand, either selling it or just closing it down. They have sold other brands in the past, and if they ever did sell the brand, they would (of course) keep the factory which is now fulfilling the role they had in mind when they bought it; making Cartier’s high end movements. But, if I had to make a bet, I would say that RD will survive, I base my judgement on one simple fact; they now make a watch I would like to wear and one that I can (just about) afford.


Many thanks to Tony P. for his outstanding photography.


(One update) Since I wrote this piece, earlier this year, Dominique Tadion has left RD & now runs the press department at the Federation d' Haute Horlogerie; the folks who run the SIHH.

From http://justwatchingwithjamesdowling.blogspot.com/2011/08/major-changes-at-roger-dubuis.html

Patrick Heiniger 1950-2013


Patrick Heiniger 1950-2013




Patrick Heiniger ran Rolex for sixteen years, between 1992 and 2008; which might seem like a fleeting moment, compared to the 90 years at the helm of his two predecessors in the job, his father Andre and Hans Wilsdorf. But under his management, Rolex changed more than they ever did under their reign. What we now think of as 'Rolex' is essentially his creation; he was responsible for three major changes; he consolidated the firm's manufacturing sites down from thirty to four, with the construction of huge new factories on Greenfield sites; he bought 'The Other Rolex' Rolex SA, the Bienne firm owned by the Aegler-Borer family, who had been manufacturing their movements since the inception of Rolex and he re-positioned the brand in the market. He re-positioned the brand by focusing on a statement made by his late father, Andre, who famously said: "Rolex is not in the watch business, we are in the luxury business." Patrick realized that a woman who is thinking about buying a two tone Datejust, isn't deciding whether to spend the purchase price on an Omega or a Rolex; rather she is deciding whether to spend it on a Louis Vuitton handbag or a Rolex. Whilst the potential purchaser of a Day Date might be contemplating trading his current Porsche 911 for a new one, and does the money go to the Porsche dealer or the Rolex one. Like most things at Rolex, these changes (whilst radical) were done quietly and it is only if you look at the company as it was twenty years ago and as it is now, that you can take in the scope of these changes.

But, I guarantee that his greatest memorial will be the four giant manufacturing complexes whose construction he oversaw; Bienne for movement manufacture, dials were made at Chéne-Bourg, which is also where diamond and jewel setting takes place; Plan les Ouates is where both cases and bracelets are manufactured and where Rolex operates its own gold foundry; whilst Acacias is where final assembly and testing takes place. The Acacias plant is also the firm's world HQ and where all of their research & development is carried out. By purchasing all of their subcontractors and then concentrating all work within these plants Rolex were not only able to rationalize their production but also able to increase the quality of the product, look at a twenty year old Rolex bracelet and compare it to a new one, the change in quality is obvious even to an untrained eye.

The previous paragraphs were about his accomplishments, now let's talk about the man; it is important to understand two things about him, he was a Swiss lawyer by training; but, on the other hand, he was the least Swiss lawyer like person I have ever met who actually was one. He always reminded me of the polo playing younger son of some minor European royal family. Tall, slim and always exquisitely attired, even on the weekend: I remember running into him at London's Portobello Road antiques market at 7:30am, one Saturday morning over a dozen years ago. He stood out amongst the crowd, not only because he was several inches taller than them, but also because he was immaculately turned out at this ungodly hour. His blazer was impeccably cut, his shoes shone like patent leather and the knot in his necktie was just that bit bigger than any one you had ever seen. That was the second or third time I had met him, and on every occasion he was the epitome of graciousness.

But, what most people who know Rolex will think of when they hear of his demise is the mystery surrounding his departure from the firm at the end of 2008. Like most things to do with Rolex, it was a private affair with little explanations given either by the firm or himself; so, as nature abhors a vacuum, the lack of information encouraged a swarm of rumours to arise. The firm batted down the most evidently incorrect ones, like the Madoff connection, but the rest continued to swirl around. Immediately below these words you will find the Rolex press release about his demise and the opening sentence explains his departure from the firm with these words; 'after a long illness'; in other words, he was suffering from cancer, he knew his time was limited and chose to spend it with his family.

For most watchnuts, Hans Wilsdorf will always be the man behind Rolex; but, for me Patrick Heiniger comes a close second. In London's St. Paul's Cathederal, the grave of its architect bears the legend "Si monumentum requiris, circumspice" (If you seek his memorial, look around you); it is also a fitting epitaph for Patrick Heiniger, when you look at the company he left behind.


Geneva, 5 March 2013 The Board of Directors and the General Management of Rolex SA express their deep sorrow on the passing of Patrick Heiniger, former Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the company, in Monaco after a long illness. They would like to pay tribute to the memory of a man who marked the history of the company when he presided over its destiny from 1992 to 2008, and extend their sincere condolences to his family and friends.

Throughout his 16 years as head of the company, Patrick Heiniger was the faithful heir to the spirit of enterprise that has made Rolex an exceptional brand. He combined tradition with the demands of an ever-evolving world and his vision brought the company solidly into the third millennium.

Patrick Heiniger was appointed Managing Director of Rolex in 1992, six years after he joined as Commercial Director. He was also named Chief Executive Officer in 1997. As the company's third Managing Director since it was founded, he followed his father, André J. Heiniger, who in 1963 had succeeded Hans Wilsdorf, the founder of Rolex. Born in Argentina in 1950, Patrick Heiniger was a lawyer by training, specializing in international and intellectual property law. He made it his mission to reinforce the defence of the brand throughout the world.

Under his impetus, in the mid-1990s Rolex made a fundamental strategic choice and opted for the vertical integration of its means of production. This strategy was intended to guarantee control over manufacturing of the essential components of the brand's watches and thus to ensure its autonomy.

Rolex decided to group at three industrial sites all of its activities located in the canton of Geneva. This step was designed to reinforce the quality of its products while remaining true to the best watchmaking tradition. The vast vertical integration programme led to the construction of new, state-of-the-art production facilities at Rolex headquarters at Acacias, at Plan-les-Ouates and at Chêne-Bourg in the 2000s, as well as at Bienne in north-western Switzerland, where a new extension building was inaugurated in October 2012.

As a true independent watchmaker of the 21st century, enjoying unprecedented freedom in the design and manufacture of its watches, Rolex could take its ambition for excellence and innovation to new heights.

In 2002, Patrick Heiniger created the Rolex Mentor and Protégé Arts Initiative, dedicated to helping promising young artists realize their full potential under the watchful eye of a renowned mentor in their discipline.

That same year, he was awarded the insignia of Chevalier of the National Order of the Legion of Honour and, in 2005, he was appointed Commander of the Order of Arts and Letters.

Patrick Heiniger retired from the helm of Rolex in December 2008.



Part Three of my Rolex Factory Articles




For the last fifty years Rolex have pursued one policy with an almost myopic vision; that of self-sufficiency. In that period, they have purchased bought almost all of the sub-contractors who used to supply them. Genex, who made cases were one of the first to be bought, then they bought Gay Freres, who made their bracelets and around a decade ago they bought Beyeler who were one of their major dial suppliers. These suppliers, and many more were scattered all around Geneva and throughout Switzerland, at one point Rolex had 27 factories; hardly the height of efficiency, so, starting in the 1990s they began a decade long programme of consolidation.
The 27 factories became three mega factories; dials were made at Chéne-Bourg, which is also where diamond and jewel setting takes place; Plan les Ouates is where both cases and bracelets are manufactured and where Rolex operates its own gold foundry; whilst Acacias is where final assembly and testing takes place. The Acacias plant is also the firm’s world HQ and where all of their research & development is carried out.

Rolex Chéne-Bourg


Rolex Plan les Ouates


Rolex Acacias

Yet despite all this consolidation, there was one part of the watch that Rolex didn’t make, and that was a rather important part, the movement. Although all the movements came from one factory which even bore the name Rolex, they didn’t own it, it was owned by the Aegler/Borer family; a family arguably as important as Wilsdorf in the history of Rolex. To understand the relationship we have to travel back over a century to the very founding of Rolex; actually, even further back, to the founding of Wilsdorf and Davis in 1905. In these early days, the firm didn’t make watches, rather it assembled them; buying movements from a few Swiss firms and putting these in cases bought from firms in the UK and in Switzerland. The vast majority of the watches they were selling were ladies’ watches, because (at this point) almost no men wore wristwatches.
As the business progressed, Wilsdorf decided to return to Switzerland, where he had previously worked, to seek out a single movement supplier, rather than the several he had been using. His eye alighted on the firm of Jean Aegler in Bienne, as they specialised in movements for ladies’ watches, as this advertisement for the original company emphasises.


He developed a close relationship with Hermann Aegler (one of Jean Aegler’s sons) and subsequently gave him the largest order for small watch movements ever placed in Switzerland. What was special about Aegler was that they specialised in Lever Escapement movements at a time when almost all small movements had Cylinder Escapements, which are inherently less accurate. Look at the label on the back of this 1912 Rolex, powered by a Rebberg movement from Aegler, the word ‘Lever’ is as prominent as ‘Rolex’.




Over the next few years the relationship between Rolex and Aegler blossomed, each riding on the popularity of the wristwatch, in 1920 Hermann Aegler became one of the owners of Rolex when he purchased 6,960 shares and was appointed to the board, along with Wilsdorf and Davis. By now Rolex was Aegler’s largest client and their second largest was the US firm Gruen. In the late 1920s two important things happened, Hermann’s nephew Emile Borer became technical director at Aegler and the relationship between Aegler and its two most important clients became formalised for the first time. Both Rolex & Gruen purchased shares in Aegler, which was then renamed “Aegler, Society Anonyme, Manufacture des Montres: Rolex et Gruen Guild A” which means “Aegler Inc; makers of watches (actually movements) for Rolex & Gruen Guild A” (the Guild A watches were the highest grade watches that Gruen sold). For the first time Rolex owned a piece of its own movement manufacturing operation.


What was quite funny was that both Rolex and Gruen liked to imply that the factory, which was still majority owned by the Aegler/Borer family, was actually owned by each of the watch firms. Have a look at the image in Gruen’s advertising.


and at one from a similar period in a Rolex publication;


The interesting thing to note is that both these illustrations are actually drawings, because neither of them reflects the real signage on the factory.
Towards the end of the 1930s, Gruen sold their shares in Aegler back to the factory and at that time Rolex Geneva did the same thing; simultaneously with this, Aegler sold their Rolex shares back to Wilsdorf. This meant that the two factories now had single family ownership; Geneva with Wilsdorf and his wife, May and Bienne with the Aegler/Borer family. However, this did not reflect a worsening relationship between the two, rather it signified a new stage in the relationship; the Aegler factory was renamed “Manufactre des Montres Rolex SA” and the two families agreed that, from now on, Geneva would only use movements from Bienne and that Bienne would only sell movements to Geneva.
This convivial, yet completely informal, relationship lasted for almost seventy years, but in March 2004 an email landed in my in-box which amazed me; Rolex Geneva had bought Rolex Bienne outright; and, not long after, the consolidation masterplan was modified to include the Bienne facilities.
Over the years, the Bienne factory had been expanded to meet the increased production needs, but it was already becoming cramped; take a look at the image below.


The tallest building, in the centre with the word “Aegler” on the roof was the original Jean Aegler building and all the others were added on, over the years, sometimes this involved parts of the complex being on different sides of the road, connected by overhead bridges.


So, even prior to the acquisition, it was decided to move to a green field site on the outskirts of Bienne and the first stage of the move to the new facility at Champs-de-Boujean was made in 1993, with a subsequent move in 2003. In other words, Rolex Bienne was out of the old factories even before Rolex Geneva purchased them. But two years after the purchase, Rolex bought a 46,000 Sq M site adjacent to the Champs-de-Boujean site. For those of you unused to metric measurements, the new site is the equivalent of over six US Football fields and is connected to the existing site which is the same size; in other words the new Rolex Bienne facility is the size of 13 US Football fields.
Construction on the site began in the summer of 2009 and almost exactly three years later, the site was ready for the official opening. The delays between the purchase of the site and the start of construction were due to the decision to make the new factories in the mould of the Rolex Geneva ones, with high levels of energy efficiency and a very sophisticated parts storage and retrieval system.
I do half a dozen watch factory visits a year; and with almost all the major brands, there is one constant: none of them allow photography within the production areas. But this isn’t because they don’t want their competitors to know what is going on; rather it is because they don’t want us customers to know that the inside of one watch factory looks just like every other watch factory. A few Electro erosion machines and banks of CNC controlled multi axis drilling & boring machines. And there isn’t even much variety amongst the machines, as all of them come from a very small group of suppliers. Not at Rolex, who make so many watches that they are in the privileged position to design and commission much of their own production machinery. So, the Rolex factory doesn’t look like everyone else’s; for example, let’s talk about security; watches are small, portable and high value. So, many firms will lock away their watches, which are in the process of production, every night in a safe like this:


This is the Rolex equivalent at the new Bienne facility:


Three stories high, but all underground, the automated stocking system is a high-security vault, located on the underground floors of the new building.
Consisting of 14 aisles of shelves, each alround 30 feet high, it has a total of more than 46,000 storage compartments.
Each of these spaces is able to receive parts in various forms of packaging placed on transport trays. In total, the vault is able to store tens of millions of components. Each aisle is served by conveyor robots –14 in all – (one per aisle) which pick up from the shelves the required trays and automatically place them on the distribution conveyors which go to the various working areas. These conveyor robots move at 10 feet a second. The delivery takes place via this vast horizontal conveyor network, including four vertical distribution towers similar to elevators which are almost 90 feet tall. The system is so efficient that it takes barely a few minutes to deliver the tray to its destination.
On each floor, near the distribution tower, a delivery station allows the users to pick up the trays they have ordered from stock and to send back those that are to be returned for storage. In total, 22 stations are set up, two of which are double: one at the receiving docks and the other dedicated to the checking and washing of components delivered by suppliers.
Computers control the automated stocking system and all the flows. A routing system coordinates some 60 programmable controllers, which manage the tray movements under way and guide the trays between the stock area and the workshops. The whole installation is continuously overseen, 24 hours a day, by an extremely high-performance software program.
Because the whole operation is computer controlled and parts can be accessed at any part of the factory, there is no need for a human being ever to enter the space; so it is not only an automated storage and retrieval system but it is also a very high security vault, containing literally millions of parts, worth millions of Swiss Francs.
Earlier I talked about the machinery that Rolex use, what is important to understand is that this machinery is used to produce the parts, the assembly of those parts is still done by hand, the way it has always been done at Rolex.
Here are the assemblers at Rolex, hard at work in the 1950s:


And here they are in the new Bienne facility:


The most specialised workers at Bienne are the folks who produce the Parachrom hairspring; which is completely made at Bienne; right from alloying the special Rolex patented alloy, all the way to making the Breguet overcoil before it is attached to the balance wheel.
Here are some of those folks at work:




In the lower image you can see how the view from the windows is on to a forest, although the site is not far out of Bienne it is not only set in a green environment, it is a very ‘green’ building, following in the footsteps of the new Rolex Geneva factories.


Like them, there is a rooftop garden, where water used by the factory is used to water the plants, many of which are herbs used in the kitchens in the nearby rooftop restaurant. The plants and their soil also provide a very efficient thermal barrier for the buildings, preventing heat from escaping during the cold months and protecting the interior from the heat of the sun during the summer.


As well as having almost all glass walls, the interior of the building is also flooded with natural light by virtue of ‘light wells’ situated throughout the central area. Reaching from the roof to the ground floor; like lamps, these overlapping wells bring natural daylight to the centre of the common areas. Their layout is reminiscent of the gear trains of a watch, a spectacular visual reference to the movement. The materials used – glass, stainless steel, light and dark wood – give a very contemporary feel to the whole interior.




The reason for having so much natural light is that not only does it cut down on the need for artificial light and energy but it is so much better to work under, and it is for this reason that watch ateliers were always on the top floor of buildings and if we look at images of Bienne in the 1960s, we see that even then, as much work as possible was done in under natural light.


What seems amazing, if you think about it, is that this giant complex is devoted to the production of only four different movements; the Rolex 22XX series, as found in the ladies’ and mid size watches; the 31XX series found in the gents’ watches; the 41XX Daytona movement, also used in the YM II and the new 90XX calibre used, so far, only in the new Sky Dweller. However, when you realise that they don’t just make the movement blanks and bridges here, but they even make the jewels, the shock protection and even the lubricants used in the watch right here in Bienne, you realise just how monumental the operation needs to be.
Bienne currently employs around 2,000 people, around a third of the firm’s total Swiss staff, with the rest at the three Geneva factories and head office. These new facilities are designed so that they can be doubled in size should the need arise; meaning that after more than a century on one site in Bienne, Rolex are set for their second century in the town in their new complex.




Posted by James Dowling at 06:04 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook




Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Pre Basel Bombshell; Citizen buys Swiss Watchmaking Group

Hello All;

Citizen, by one measure, the world's biggest watchmaking company today announced the purchase of Prothor.

Yes, I know that you have never heard of Prothor, but you might well have heard of the firms owned by Prothor; La Joux Perret a movement manufacturer, Prototec, a components maker and Arnold & Son a high end watch brand.

In their submission to the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Citizen said that they paid 64.6 million Swiss Francs for the company.

The plans are two fold, there is now a possibility for Citizen to produce 'Swiss Made' watches and there is potential for Porotec to become a full fledged competitor to the Swatch Group's ETA as Porotec will now have access to Citizen's hairspring manufacturing technology.

This is major news, by any measure. I plan to speak to someone at Citizen on Wednesday & will pass on any information I can obtain.


The above are the few facts as known at this moment; here is some wild and utterly unverified speculation;
1 Citizen were upset when the rules of the 2009 chronometry competition were announced and they saw that Asian manufacturers were excluded. Unlike Seiko who won major prizes in the mid 1960s, Citizen have never entered the Swiss chronometer competitions and they saw their new mechanical 'The Citizen' watch as their chance to garner some laurels. By buying a Swiss company, they can then make the watch in Switzerland and then enter it.


2 The three largest hairspring manufacturers in the world are the Nivarox/FAR division of ETA, Citizen and Seiko. Should Citizen transfer some of their hairspring manufacturing technology to their new Swiss subsidiary along with Swiss production of their Miyota movements; they have the POTENTIAL to become the first ever real competition to ETA. Sure, lots of people from DeBethune to Rolex are making their own hairsprings nowadays, but they are almost all used in house. To the best of my knowledge, there is no-one producing them on a large scale for sale. If Citizen start to produce them in Switzerland, it will genuinely be a game changer.


Please feel free to comment & I will update this with any information I get at Basel in the next few days.

Posted by James Dowling at 04:53 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

Labels: Chronometers, Citizen, Hairsprings


Monday, 5 September 2011

Doing it right at Roger Dubuis



In August I had the pleasure of spending a few days at the Roger Dubuis factory and had essentially unfettered access to the place and the staff.

If we are honest, RD have previously been known for three things: phenomenally designed movements, over the top case & dial designs and a reliability record only rivalled by the TU 144 'Konkordski'.

The new management are truly determined to change the final point, but you hear these sort of things from PR people all the time, so I learn to take them with the proverbial grain of salt.

Probably the most complex movement that Roger Dubuis make is the RD 01, a double flying tourbillon with 319 parts.






In parallel with developing the brand new movement for the new Monagasque line



their design department also undertook a detailed analysis of all the current movements.



In the course of this analysis, they diagnosed several inherent areas in the RD 01 movement which could prove to be problematic. So, they redesigned the movement; this wasn't just a quick fix, it involved redesigning 32 individual components, including the main plate and changing the watch from having the two tourbillons rotating in opposite directions to having them move in the same one.

That was a good idea, redesigning the movement so that it was less likely to present problems down the line. But it was what they did next that signaled that the firm were truly committed to quality. They then contacted all their distributors and asked them to return any watches still in stock and they retro fitted them with the new movements and returned them. Then they went to the retailers and asked them to send back any watches they had and finally, they had the retailers contact all the original owners of the watches, and they were all brought back to the factory, no matter if they were out of warranty, and brought right up to date.

In all, around 100 watches were revised, not exactly an insignificant operation. I don't know if any other firm has done this, but I have to say it certainly shows a commitment to quality I haven't previously encountered.